The Ad Mail Flood That Isn’t

The Winston-Salem Journal has helpfully provided “some numbers on the amount of junk mail the typical American receives each year.” (See: The Cost of Garbage Collection, June 9, 2008)

According to the paper each individual will receive 560 pieces of ad mail each year; 10.8 pieces per week; and it notes that 42 percent of all pulpwood is made into paper,

Let’s see, mail is generally delivered six days a week and there are 52 weeks a year so that means there are 312 delivery days annually. Less federal holidays, maybe 300 delivery days a year. So, if 560 pieces of mail are delivered each year and there are 300 delivery days that means each day results in less than two pieces of ad mail per person.

This hardly sounds like a crisis.

As to the 10.8 pieces of ad mail per week, just how remarkable is it given that there are six delivery days in a typical week? Still less than two per day.

Then we see that 42 percent of all pulpwood is made into paper. Notice that pulpwood is made into “paper” and not just mail. So, for example, according to the EPA in 2006 there were 44,840,000 tons of paper and paperboard products produced — of which 12,360,000 tons were used to make newspapers and 5,890,000 tons were used to create advertising mail. (See: 2006 MSW Characterization Data Tables, EPA, table 4)

Here are some interesting facts the Winston-Salem Journal left out:

Newspapers compete with the mailstream for advertising dollars. As the Washington Post has explained, “magazines and newspapers have been at war with advertising mailers for a long time — ever since the mailers began siphoning ad dollars away from publications. Indeed, newspaper editorialists invented the term ‘junk mail’ in the early 1950s, according to Richard Kielbowicz, an associate professor of communications at the University of Washington, Seattle, and an expert on postal rate issues.” (See: The Junk Mail Plague: You Can Run But You Can’t Hide,” April 22, 1991.)

If the Journal wants to tell the whole story, it should plainly inform readers that it competes with mailers. It should say that the term “junk mail” is a slur developed by the newspaper community to disparage a commercial rival. It should note that newspapers, like advertising mail, are made from paper but that a significant percentage of both products are made from recycled materials.

The Journal should explain to readers that advertisers can market their goods and services through a variety of media. Advertisers, being lucid and logical, will not use media that does not produce results.

The use of ad mail has proven to be effective and efficient for many advertisers. If that were not the case, surely advertisers would take their dollars elsewhere.

And ad mail has value: The mailstream anchors 8,300,000 jobs nationwide and the production of goods and services worth $1.2 trillion annually. Is the economy so strong that we can do away with so many jobs inside our borders?

The Journal can do better than this. It needs to update its style manual to purge the term “junk mail” from its pages — or it needs to explain to readers how the term came about each and every time it is used.

Technorati Tags: advertising, mail, newspapers